Across |
5. | Prior decision or opinion covering a similar issue that can be used as a standard or guide in a later case |
6. | Opinion written by less than a majority of the judges on the court that agrees with result reached by the majority but not with all the reasoning |
7. | Judge-made law in the absence of controlling statutory law or other higher law |
13. | Acronym that stands for the components of legal analysis: issue, rule, application of the rule to the facts, and conclusion |
14. | Controlling opinion that is joined by the largest number of judges on the bench short of a majority |
16. | Portion of rule about which the parties cannot agree |
18. | Sufficiently similar to justify a similar outcome or resuit |
19. | One of the circumstances or considerations that will be weighed in making a decision, no one of which is conclusive |
20. | Courts should decide similar cases in the same way unless there is a good reason for the court to do otherwise |
21. | Pertaining to a court decision that is based on the facts and on the substance of the claim, rather than on a procedural ground |
22. | General topic and a number for one of its subtopics |
24. | Short-paragraph summary of a portion of court opinion printed before the opinion begins |
25. | Final judgment on the merits will preclude the same parties from later relitigating the same claim and any other claim based on the same facts or transaction that could have been raised in the first suit but was not |
26. | Opinion whose result and reasoning are supported by at least half plus one of the judges on the court |
27. | Book, CD-ROM, or online service containing lists of citations that can help you assess the current validity of an opinion, statute, or other item; and give you leads to additional relevant materials |
28. | Document submitted (filed) by a party to an appellate court in which arguments are presented on why the appellate court should affirm (approve), reverse, or otherwise modify what a lower court has done |